The Lord Rejects Saul as king
January 22, 2021
Commentary
Saul was given specific instructions, through Samuel, to utterly destroy the Amalekites (vv. 1-3). Saul and his men smote the Amalekites but he did not utterly destroy them, as God had commanded (vv. 4-7). He spared Agag, the king, and kept the best of the spoil (vv. 8-9). Saul had no right to spare Agag. Neither did he have the right to save from destruction the best of the cattle and other animals. He thought he had won a great victory but God saw it as a great failure. Saul had disobeyed Him and then he lied to Samuel about the results of the battle. Samuel had chosen Saul, along with the people, but now he regretted his choice (vv. 10-11). Samuel loved Saul and wanted him to be a good king. He may have wanted Saul, even more than David, to be successful. But God had rejected Saul. When Samuel arrived on the scene, he could see and hear the evidence of Saul’s wrong actions (vv. 12-13). Then when he was confronted, Saul said he only kept these choice animals to sacrifice them to God (vv. 14-15). This was, of course, an attempt to cover up his disobedience with a pious pretense. Saul has been disobedient and judgment is coming.
Samuel told Saul that he had a message for him from the Lord, and Saul told him to speak (v. 16). Samuel told him that the Lord anointed him king over Israel (v. 17) and sent him on a mission to destroy the Amalekites until they were all killed (v. 18). Samuel questions Saul as to why he did evil by taking the spoil and not obeying the voice of the Lord (v. 19). Saul tried to justify his disobedience by claiming that the animals were taken to use as a sacrifice to the Lord, and were brought because of the insistence of the soldiers (vv. 20-21). But Samuel responded with a statement of principle that is timeless in its application: “To obey is better than sacrifice, and to heed is better than the fat of rams” (v. 22). In addition to disobeying, Saul was guilty of rebellion, arrogance, and rejecting God’s word (v. 23). Saul said he was afraid of the people and so he obeyed their wishes (v. 24). He wanted to please everyone. Saul confessed his transgression, but his repentance was not genuine (v. 25). The result for Saul was the Lord rejecting him as king (v. 26), symbolized by Saul’s tearing of Samuel’s robe (vv. 27-28). This repudiation of Saul and selection of a replacement (David) did not mean that God had misled Samuel or even changed His mind (v. 29). Saul has sinned and so God must deal with him accordingly (vv. 30-31). God had from the beginning chosen another, one who would be “after His own heart” (cf. 13:14; 16:1). Though still recognized by the people as their king for about 15 more years, Saul was deposed by the Lord right then, and Samuel executed Agag (vv. 32-33). The finality of it all was not missed by Samuel for from that day Samuel never visited the king again (vv. 34-35). Samuel mourned for Saul when God told him he was taking his kingdom away.
Application
If I try to gloss over sin in order to protect what I have or for material gain, I am not being smart but simply disobeying God, which is sin. Selective obedience is just another form of disobedience.